he Trump administration is considering new ways to expand US defences against a potential missile attack both within the country and beyond, AP reported.

Donald Trump’s approach to the system is expected to focus on stopping missiles before they are launched or in the first few minutes of flight while their booster engines are still burning. Congress has reportedly encouraged the Pentagon to push harder on that approach, which might include the use of drones equipped with lasers.

AP cited unnamed senior administration officials as saying that they’re interested in developing and deploying more effective means of detecting and tracking missiles with a constellation of satellites in space. For instance, they may use advanced sensors to trace a hostile missile “so that an anti-missile weapon can be directed into its flight path”.

The media outlet, however, noted that deploying missile interceptors aboard satellites in space is not expected to be part of the Trump strategy.

According to AP, the United States is expected to reveal the details after the Pentagon releases the results of a missile defence review on Thursday.

The release of the document was delayed last year for unknown reasons, although it came as Trump was engaged in talks with North Korea’s Kim Jong-un on denuclearisation. The publication might have complicated the negotiations.

In a parallel development, Russia has sent a letter to US lawmakers, accusing Washington of undermining the New Strategic Arms Reduction (New START) treaty, a 2010 bilateral accord on nuclear arms reduction, The Wall Street Journal reported.

“In the worst case scenario, these problems might potentially disrupt prospects for its extension after 2021. […] We cannot confirm full implementation by the United States of its obligations under Article II of the Treaty. Accordingly, we shall continue to point out this situation in the course of bilateral contacts on all levels, as well as direct the attention of the international community to this absolutely abnormal state of affairs”.

ALSO READ  China unveils new version of JH-7 fighter bomber

The New START treaty, which was signed in 2010 and entered into force a year later, covers a ten-year period with the possibility of a five-year extension. The accord limits the number of deployed intercontinental ballistic missiles, submarine-launched ballistic missiles, nuclear-armed bombers, and nuclear warheads.

Talks on nuclear non-proliferation between the two countries have been in limbo since the Trump administration announced plans to withdraw from the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty has accused Russia of violations.

Moscow has flatly denied the allegation, emphasizing that Washington, for its part, was deploying launchers for Tomahawk cruise missiles in Romania and Poland – a violation of the INF Treaty’s provisions.

The treaty was signed by the Soviet Union and the US and envisaged the destruction of all nuclear-armed ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges between 500 and 5,500 kilometres (about 300 to 3,400 miles).

 

 

Source: Sputnik

Advertisements
Share this article:
  • 118
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    118
    Shares
The International News Desk reports on issues and events world wide.

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

“deploying missile interceptors aboard satellites in space is not expected to be part of the Trump strategy.” => This would violate the space neutrality treaty and start a new stupid arms race that would hurt many major countries economies, including the US one. “The release of the document was delayed last year for unknown reasons, although it came as Trump was engaged in talks with North Korea’s Kim Jong-un on denuclearisation. The publication might have complicated the negotiations.” => Very likely since it would imply haard to cope with issues about size, weight, power and overall interstellar costs. If you… Read more »

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

More about it (Aviationweek needs registration) :
https://tinyurl.com/ycjq9bkx