Trump National Security Advisor John Bolton has blasted the S-400 deal as one of several major stumbling blocks in US-Turkish relations.

“We’re concerned about their purchase of the Russian air defence system called the S-400 – that’s a big problem,” Bolton said, speaking to AM 970 radio host John Catsimatidis on Sunday morning.

Asked directly by Catsimatidis whether Turkey was a “friend or foe” to the United States, the top Trump foreign policy adviser cited a host of other problems affecting relations.

“Well you know they’re still a NATO ally; we’re trying to work with them, but they’ve got a very bad relationship with our close friends in Israel. That’s something we need to look out on,” Bolton said, adding that disagreements “with respect to the conflict in Syria” were another issue.

“I think President Trump would like to have a good relationship with Turkey; he’d like to see US trade with Turkey increase, but we need them to help us out in some of these other problems in Syria and elsewhere in the region,” he said.

Ankara and Moscow penned a $2.5-billion contract on the delivery of four battalion sets of S-400s to Turkey in 2017, with the advanced air defence system expected to start being delivered this year. Washington has pressured Ankara to back away from the deal, and offered the country a $3.5 billion Patriot air defence system contract in place of the S-400s.

Turkey has ignored the requests, and insisted that it still expects to receive the first of its US-made F-35 fighter jets by November, despite attempts by the Pentagon to lobby Congress to block the sale of F-35s to Turkey if it went ahead with its S-400 purchase.

Last week, Pentagon spokesman Charlie Summers warned that “there would be grave consequences” for the US-Turkish military relationship if Ankara didn’t cancel the S-400 deal. “They will not get the F-35s if they take the S-400s,” the official said.

ALSO READ  China gets new Su-35 jets as US prepares to deliver F-16s to Taiwan

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan blasted the Pentagon’s ultimatum, saying the Turkish-Russian deal was “not connected to the security of NATO, the United States or the F-35 in any way.”

US officials have repeatedly called on Ankara to scrap the S-400 deal and called the possible deployment of S-400s in areas where F-35s are set to operate a “threat,” presumably because the system would allow Turkey to test just how formidable the F-35’s stealth systems are when matched up against the Russian air defence system.

 

 

Source: Sputnik

Advertisements
Share this article:
  • 290
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    290
    Shares

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
bucek
Member
Regular
Upvoted
bucek

“They will not get the F-35s if they take the S-400s,” the official said.

Well, that makes perfect sense. Cos if they got them, it could turn out that F-35s are perfectly visible on S-400s and … kabooom! … all worldwide contracts for “lol-steathy” F-35 would go down the drain.

Ahmed
Guest
Ahmed

The Patriot system although expensive, is not worth having it. It is never a good system. The US is cheating all the countries in NATO to buy the F 35 which seems to have problems that the US tries to hide.

Pink
Guest
Pink

Erdogan wants to save money for the F-35. Erdogan has two F-35s.Two bad planes are enough for Sultan Erdogan

Gerd Görges
Guest
Gerd Görges

“Well you know they’re still a NATO ally; we’re trying to work with them, but they’ve got a very bad relationship with our close friends in Israel.”

That’s all you need to know really. That’s what NATO is about. Of course, it takes a moron like Boron to spell it out in a press conference.